Grist to the Mill

30 October, 2005

BIRDS

By coincidence, was in Tesco a week ago and ended up in the 'wild birdseed' aisle (! - ten years ago you'd have had to visit a pet shop or similar to buy this), so, since it was there I bought some. I wasn't aware in advance, but yesterday was National Bird Feeding Day, so I used my very average binoculars to watch any birdseed action that might have been going on. It's so compulsive - especially when there's an essay to be written. So far this weekend I've seen:

a pair of Greenfinches
a lone Goldfinch
a pair of Songthrushes (they may even have been Fieldfares. It's hard to tell but they were definitely one or the other)
a Collared Dove (which sat on top of the feeder scaring all the smaller birds away)
a large group of Blue Tits
several Coal Tits
possibly some Great Tits (not 100% certain about this).

That's just in two days. A few weeks ago as I was getting up and ready to leave, I saw a Greater Spotted Woodpecker sitting on the fence. It's surprising how many birds are around - it's not exactly the middle of the countryside here. I want to buy some live mealworms by mail order to attract more birds, although last night someone suggested this might be taking it a bit far.

|

27 October, 2005

KIDS AND THE QUESTIONS THEY ASK

Walked through town this afternoon. It's half term so lots more kids around. As I approached the town centre I had to wait at the kerb for the lights to change. This was the last street before the pedestrianised section.

A father approached the bit of pavement where the lights halt the traffic. He was with his two young sons. The older child had some kind of whistle in his mouth.

Focusing on keeping his two young charges safe, the man was concentrating on getting them over the road when one of them asked a brilliant question in all seriousness:
"Da-aad? Can you ever play the kazoo too much?"

|

SCHOOL PLACEMENT

I'm currently at 'School A'. The first time I was supposed to meet my mentor she was distracted by cooing over a 16-year-old student's week-old baby. The second time I met her she had to leave to speak to the police who were chasing an errant teenager all over Wokingham. I looked up the school's results on Ofsted. Only 45% of students get 5 GCSEs at grade A-C. I know I don't need to make this point, it's clear to see, but this is less than half. I thought that was pretty poor, so looked up my old school to see how it compares. I had a bad experience of school, in that I didn't learn anything until I got into the sixth form (when things began to improve). My bog-standard comprehensive is not much better - only 46% get five A-Cs at GCSE! Thus, attending this particular school is like being back at school myself. It is proving to be a Proust-ian experience rich in sensation, atmosphere, memory. But also deeply depressing. I can see myself in some of the kids. The bright ones, streamed into the inappropriately low sets with both parents and teachers failing to notice their intelligence, they are compliant, passive, bored, switched off and withdrawn. They doodle and watch the clock. That was pretty-much my experience.

State schools are okay but they do fail a lot of brighter kids, I think. How is it possible to spend 12 years in compulsory education and come out knowing nothing about politics, languages or the World Wars?!? But knowing plenty about how to be invisible.

Not that I'm bitter, or anything...

|

26 October, 2005

LOLITA

Attended a lecture called 'Children At Risk' yesterday. The chap delivering the lecture kept referring to Lolita (Nabokov) as an example of how paedophiles home into the family circle, winning the trust of parents/guardians in order to gain access to minors. He kept referring to the main character and narrator as "Humpert Humpert" when his name is "Humbert Humbert". If he will cite such a great novel he should try to get such details right, I think. (If I didn't like the book so much I wouldn't care, admittedly.) Perhaps 'Hump'-ert rather than 'Humb'-ert was some kind of slip ??

Anyway, after the lecture had finished I wasn't thinking about children at risk anymore, I was considering the relationship between Humbert Humbert and Lolita. From memory, I recall finishing the book in the belief that - okay, he was a deeply reprehensible pervy paedophile - but that he also loved her. I picked up the book to find out why I should think this way. Here's a telling paragraph:

"One last word", I said in my horrible careful English, "are you quite, quite sure that - well, not tomorrow of course, and not after tomorrow, but - well - some day, any day, you will not come to live with me? I will create a brand new God and thank him with piercing cries, if you give me that microscopic hope" (to that effect).
"No", she said smiling, "No".
"It would have made all the difference"...
Then, as I drove away, I heard her shout in a vibrant voice to her boy; and the dog started to lope alongside my car like a fat dolphin, but he was too heavy and old, and very soon gave up.
And presently I was driving through the drizzle of the dying day, with the windshield wipers in full action but unable to cope with my tears.

So, imho, it's not merely about sex although this is what people tend to remember.
And if Lolita seems bad, it's not nearly as extreme as The Enchantress (lesser known but the precurser to Lolita). Here, the narrator describes the pubescent object of his lust in vividly physical detail, wittering on about her gamine limbs, bony clavicles, etc, etc.

|

25 October, 2005

BIRD STATISTICS

Apparently, there's been a 10% rise in Kingfisher numbers. Can't remember where I read this but it was in a newspaper within the last fortnight. I've never seen one but hope I'm more likely to in the light of this increase. Also, I live near a river and a canal, so surely I'll encounter one sooner or later...

Also, Goldfinches weigh an incredible five grams. Which is staggering. How do they manage the journey from the Scandie countries to here, I wonder? And how do they 'touch down' in a strong wind?

|

23 October, 2005

The psycho-dynamics of behaviour

This happened on Saturday night. It's nothing revelationary but of interest to me so will record it in order to remember.

Went very briefly to a working class boozer for a drink, didn't feel like hanging around (feeling uninspired by the company I went along with) so went home. Incidentally, it was someone's birthday party in what seemed to be the lounge or a function room. It seemed to be a bit of a lacklustre party and not many people were there, or hadn't arrived yet. The pub's regulars seemed to be taking part in the celebrations which made the numbers seem less sparse than they would've been otherwise. The pub landlord was clearly a big personality who perhaps fancied himself as a bit of a smoothie. He was pleasant though, and not obnoxious with it.

As I came back out to the pub from the toilets, he approached me with arms outstretched in a "let's dance" gesture. It was clear that he didn't mean a proper dance, it would've been more of a quick, 'pretend' dance. I really didn't want to though - I'm not the world's greatest dancer even when it's a mock-up. But I didn't want to seem cold or haughty - it was very much a local's local. So, smiling, I said to him as he reached out to me (in what seemed to be a non-sexual way), "My hands are wet!". This didn't seem to be enough, so I added quickly, "And I can't dance, either". Without missing a beat he said, quick as a flash, "What do you mean, 'either'? What else can't you do?". Which I thought was a fast and clever riposte.

Thinking about it as I walked home, he may have done this in the role of jovial proprietor, to try to make me feel welcome/at ease in a small pub frequented by regulars. This didn't occur to me at the time. I didn't have time to consider it as his approach was out-of-the-blue and I'd been in another room so didn't foresee it. And my friendly response (it was a good-natured encounter) was borne out of the wish not to appear unfriendly or like an imposter.

Which is but a small example of how our interactions are all - always - underpinned by minute interpersonal tides and dynamics.

|

New Look

I changed the template because I decided, finally, to complete the profile section that BlogSpot provides. When I occasionally look at random blogs, it is vexing to find no details about the blogger. I'd deleted all the relevant profile bits from the previous template and had to start again and choose an un-messed-with template. I liked this one because it reminds me of the Woodland Trust.

But frankly, this is immensely frustrating. I can't get the comments to work and it is DULL waiting for things to refresh. It is one of those things I wish I'd never started in the first place...

|

18 October, 2005

MEMORY

Sometimes, just from time-to-time and in common with most people, I have trouble remembering things. It could be the time I arranged to meet someone, a remark made in passing, or the outcome of something.

Here is what Freud says on the matter. This appears in the introduction to a Pocket Penguin book ('Forgetting Things'). The italics are his - they appear in the text.

"I will therefore give an account of striking examples of forgetfulness, most of them observed in myself. I distinguish the forgetting of impressions and experiences, that is to say, things I have seen or done, from the forgetting of intentions, that is to say, omitting to do something. I will begin by stating the uniform result of a whole series of observations: in all cases the motive for forgetting something proved to be based on aversion."

Avoidance is a potent force...

|

10 October, 2005

A Level Students

Me: So what did you study before Howard's End?
Sts: Frankenstein.
Me: Did you enjoy it?
St 1: Frankenstein?! What a load of crap!
St 2: That was, like, so awful.
Me: But didn't you like the uneasy atmosphere? Did you get a sense of events gathering momentum and spiralling out of control?
St 3: I couldn't read it. It took ages. [It's a relatively short novel]
Me: What about the balance of power tilting from the creator to his creation. That was quite interesting, wasn't it?
St 4: It had a terrible narrative. The narration was awful.
St 1: My God it was so heavy. I hated it.
Me: Oh, right...

|

09 October, 2005

BAN ON SMOKING

So it seems Blair is going the whole hog and will soon outlaw smoking in all public places, rather than only those where food is on sale. I'm surprised at this from an economic point of view. Crudely speaking, smokers tend to be concentrated among the working classes (I know this is a sweeping generalisation). So working-class smokers who perhaps give up as a result of this measure will live longer. They are less likely to own their own home or have an adequate pension. They will not contribute so much to the treasury as a result of paying fewer indirect taxes (the cost of a pack of 20). Treating lung cancer isn't that expensive anyway, as it seems to be more-or-less untreatable. So can the treasury afford to have all these ex-smokers living longer?? Blair should just let them all die and reduce the already bulging, ageing demographic, to saying nothing of the worsening pensions crisis. I suppose they have taken all this into consideration...

On a different note, I find I am consumed with hi-fi upgrade fever (and the urge to pen strange pieces of creative writing, see last post). For the next eight months I'm a full-time student so this is a straightforward case of displacement activity. Damn.

|

07 October, 2005

I can't think of a title for this...


All crossings were suspended when I arrived at the terminal. This reinforced what I already knew: the journey had been awful and it wasn’t over yet. The train to the harbour had taken four hours where it would usually take just an hour and a half. Disgruntled and disbelieving, I turned from the reception desk to look at the boarding gate. Instead of skimming to-and-fro across the short stretch of water, a stationary catamaran sat bobbing on the waves, snug against the harbour’s wall. Its radar was motionless where it should have been rotating, waving passengers aboard.

Crossings were suspended because of high winds and heavy seas; my half-hearted protest was met with “Sorry. Circumstances beyond our control”. And they were right – the weather was nobody’s fault, nobody’s oversight. It would have been futile to continue complaining to powerless staff wearing stiff uniforms on a dreary Sunday afternoon. After a few moments acclimatising to the idea, I realised I didn’t really mind. The ‘big boat’ had more romance to it. The crossing took longer and it felt like striking out properly from the land. The robust, rusting car ferry was substantial as an aging, gone-to-seed Bentley compared to the catamaran, which cut through the water like a moped through traffic. I boarded a coach with some other passengers and five minutes later we were set down at the docks. We trudged up the foot-passenger ramp, mute as cattle boarding a truck.

During the crossing, I ordered and drank some coffee in the lounge before heading for the open deck, still holding the empty cup. Downstairs, the boat had been swaying, melodramatically. This had given me the incentive to go outside to look at the swirling water. Downstairs, amid the stale air, worn upholstery and oppressive heating, the swaying was most noticeable when looking out through a small, grubby window towards a cross-channel ferry. The bigger ferry had seemed stable when we were in a calm stretch, but, from time to time and framed within the square window, it had seemed to veer wildly across the angry patch of sea. A handrail in the passenger lounge tilted to and fro, so that first the right-hand side and then the left formed a sharp diagonal across my line of vision.

Inspired by the momentum of the boat and the obvious turbulence of the water, I headed for the open deck. There were occasional swells and foaming crests on the waves. While I stood at the side of the boat looking out to sea, I had a whimsical urge to throw the empty cup. I recalled one of D’s stories. He’d told me about someone, probably him, in fact, who used to work on a sightseeing boat on the Thames. Employed to wash the pots, if any pieces of crockery were filthy or had particularly dried-on remnants of food, he would casually slide them into the river. I toyed with condemning the cup to a similar fate. I imagined it: falling down to the sea bed, rocking gently from side to side on its drifting descent through the vast gloom. I wondered how long it would take to reach the bottom, and how far the boat would have moved on by such a time. The smooth, curved sides – more uniform than any stone or shell – would appear stark and miraculous on its inevitable journey. I wondered what the cup would pass as it sank through the water, and thought of cartoon bubbles and fronds of greasy seaweed. I imagined it landing softly on the seabed with a bump, presumably right-side up. Would any curious crustaceans scuttle inside to investigate? Would the cup fill with sand after a few tides, becoming buried beneath sand and sea, to be lost for ever and all time… Or would it be washed up a few days later, further down the coast?

I decided to throw the cup. I wanted to hurl it like a shot put through the air, translating thought to action. Part of the allure was that, as soon as it dipped beneath the surface of the waves, its sinking would be unseen. Not even I would see it sink – yet I would know, and this pleased me in a childish way. The act would enhance my ability to imagine, and so I wandered around the deck in pursuit of a sufficiently private spot. Only two places were not overlooked and I felt ready. Looking down directly at the water, I realized the true extent of the plunge. It was a good 40-foot drop from the top of the boat. Compounding this was the ferry’s motion – it ploughed on at considerable speed through the water and through the exceptionally strong wind. The decision had now been complicated. Did I dare to throw the cup? It was such a simple act, after all, and hardly the most rebellious feat. I realized I was standing alone on an open deck in the darkness of mid-winter, getting wetter and colder by the minute, earnestly wondering how to throw a trivial object from a commercial ferry. I also realized that if asked to explain myself, it would be a very difficult act to justify.

But now it had become important to throw this cup. I wanted to watch its trajectory and witness its vanishing. If I threw it from this solitary spot, out and away from the boat, the wind could grab it and toss it back, slamming it against one of the windows of the passenger lounge, fifteen or twenty feet below. I knew the weather must be severe for the catamarans to be suspended and there was a real danger of misjudging the windspeed out at sea. If the window cracked or shattered, the boat would be damaged and the unsuspecting passengers shocked or even injured. I had to rule it out from that part of the deck.

I was still determined. Having got this far with the line of enquiry, it seemed a shame to give up. The urgency had decreased but the desire remained. I’d planted the idea in my mind and felt the need to see it through. At this stage, I was daring myself. It reminded me of a particularly foolish whim I’d hit upon many years ago as a pre-school child aged about three or four. While out in the city centre, holding my mum’s hand on pavements with dropped kerbs, I would will myself to extend one of my tiny feet under the wheel of a passing car, just to see if, and how much, this hurt. The proximity of the cars and ignorance of their weight had tempted me. Looking back, it had been similar to the cup. I’d wanted to do it because it was possible – because I could. Fortunately, I never did. I cringed at the memory, remembering how close I’d been, at times, to sticking my infant foot under the fat black tyre of a passing car.

Back on the boat, I found another spot from which to launch the cup. From the rear of a forward-moving boat seemed the logical place – here, there could be no danger of accidentally striking a person or window. I was poised for action. I put my bag down on the wet wooden decking and swapped the cup from my left to my right hand… then realized another obstacle: the car deck. It formed the base of the boat, a long way down and immediately on the water. It was much longer than the exposed deck where I stood. This ‘rear ground’ level tapered in a long V-shape that made the ferry efficient and buoyant, but the space was full of empty cars and lorries. It was too easy to imagine the cup clattering through a windscreen. I assumed that if this happened and I were identified as the culprit, it would be seen as a willful act of vandalism that no account would properly explain. I’d have to pay for a new windscreen, would receive a lifelong ban from travelling on the operator’s ferries and – worst of all – my name would probably appear in the local paper. Any of our names appearing in the same sentence as ‘Court’ or ‘caught’ was one of my mother’s worst fears. The County Press, written by second-rate local journalists and full of provincial gossip, was read once a week by every literate person on the island. I couldn’t take the risk.

The cup’s long, slow, inevitable fall to the seabed, unseen by anyone, was still on my mind, but I felt defeated. The 40-foot drop could’ve been overcome by walking down several flights of stairs to the car deck. It would make more sense to throw the cup from there, where there would be no danger of striking anything other than the accommodating sea. Although practical, this defeated the point. The attraction was hurling it from a distance of several storeys, of watching the teacup become a textbook abstraction, ‘describing a curve’ before disappearing for good. So there I stood, gazing out to a stormy sea in darkness. I probably resembled a lovesick thinker pondering something profound or romantic. I was only trying to summon up some pluck. I urged myself on. I told myself to throw the cup on the count of ten, counted to ten and then started again anyway. The rain returned in earnest with raindrops sudden, fat and abundant. In the time it took to retreat to the shelter of the boat’s warm interior – and it required all of my strength to open the heavy wooden door against a gale-force wind – I had been thoroughly soaked. My hair was soggy, and strands of it stuck to my face; rainwater slithered across my cold bare hands. When I returned to my seat, it pleased me to see a small puddle of rain nestling within the cup.


(Like the hair-pulling tot on the bus, on a boring journey one has to make one's own entertainment)

|

06 October, 2005

Favourite New Word

Sciamachy, n., pl. -chies.
The act or instance of fighting a shadow or imaginary enemy.

|

Overheard on a Bus

Had to get on a bus today (eugh!). It was school-hometime and very busy, on a very busy route.

A straight-laced looking woman held her daughter, who looked as though she was about three. The mother was not old but not young. I'd say she was about 38. The child was very active and she was climbing about on her mother and on the seat. A tolerant black woman sat next to them. The girl was called Emily. She had a big, round pasty face and a severe mousy bob. She was wearing cutesy flower print trousers and quite literally wouldn't stop talking. She was clearly a very intelligent child and very, very bored.

Anyway, all of a sudden she grasped a big clump of her mother's hair and yanked it hard. Expecting a reaction but not getting one, she did it again and then asked, "Mummy, is that funny?". She was very mischievous. Her mother replied, without changing her facial expression, and without varying her tone, "No. It's not funny to hurt people". The mother then carried on staring out of the window.

That's all.

|

05 October, 2005

More Fun in the First Person

I was nothing like Liz – plain, stocky, quiet, and not at all musical, although I quite liked Beethoven. I’d never tell jokes to the whole class or anything like that. Mathematics, Physics and Chemistry were my subjects. I can’t remember how she’d managed to drag me away from St Ursula's for the morning, and I thought it a very dangerous thing to do. Truanting! Thorny Copse was out of school bounds. If anyone at school knew where we were, there’d be letters to our parents and everything. Already that week, Jessica and Sophie and their friends had defaced their textbooks, thrown Ann into the school pond and hidden my clothes in the changing rooms after I’d played badly at hockey. With no towel and no clothes, I’d had to wrap myself in a shower curtain and sprint back across the fields while they squealed with laughter. The girls at the school were fond of mischief, but I never expected it to be me!

But Liz… she wasn’t like the others. We were the misfits who didn’t fit in. Liz, with her curly red hair and freckles, and me – a beanpole with bad eyesight.

Liz crouched among the fallen leaves pointing to some toadstools she’d brought me to see. “Look! That’s where the fairies live!”. I humoured her as I always did. “Oh, okay Lizzie”. I didn’t want us to be found out and I had to write an essay about the Bayeux Tapestry for tomorrow. But Liz was engrossed. I crouched down to look at the fungi and began to wonder what its name was. I became entranced by it and made notes in my jotter, “whitish stem, tall grey cap, frills on the stalk”. I was looking forward to visiting the library later on.

“Oi” shouted Mr Ogden, a figure of fun at the school because some girls said he walked a bit like a rooster. We were all scared of him, though. Some said he'd been in the army before he became a master at St Ursula's. But there he was, the tweedy old ogre, but what was he doing? Gosh! He was only releasing his dogs! “Quick Liz, run! My black lace-up shoes pounded in puddles and chocolate mud. My face burned with shame and sprigs of branches; my legs stung as thorns ripped my stockings. The mild Autumn sun pressed weakly to the ground as if nothing had happened. I was scared and my heart was pounding as hard as my feet in the mud. I didn’t know the way because Liz had brought me and now she was nowhere to be seen. Oh no! There was the school, redbrick and lovely in the distance – my beloved library through the window. But right now I had to choose between dogs or the river. My stomach flipped into my mouth like a queer pancake. I jumped.

Leather shoes weighing me down, filling with water; satchel clinging round my neck like a strong arm... All I could think of was the trouble I’d be in, later. Would they tell my parents? Blue and green and grey fused together: the banks, the sky, the mud, the water. Where were my spectacles? Without them I couldn’t see my way to the bank. I felt something brush against my legs… What was it? I grasped in a frenzy for something anchored, rooted to the earth, but it was only a weed that came away in my hands. Covered in wet leaves, hair spreading across the water like a fan, my notebook with the toadstool notes floating to the bottom, I disappeared….

|

National Poetry Day

So here is one by John Berryman. Presume it is about how children lose their innocence, yet never completely (as poet reminds himself, see the last line). Adults on the other hand, through accumulated experience, gain the ability to get beyond themselves and see things with a more equivocal eye. Something like that, anyway.

The Ball Poem

What is the boy now, who has lost his ball,
What, what is he to do? I saw it go
Merrily bouncing, down the street, and then
Merrily over - there it is in the water!
No use to say 'O there are other balls':
An ultimate shaking grief fixes the boy
As he stands rigid, trembling, staring down
All his young days into the harbour where
His ball went. I would not intrude on him,
A dime, another ball, is worthless. Now
He senses first responsibility
In a world of possessions. People will take balls
Balls will be lost always, little boy,
And no one buys a ball back. Money is external.
He is learning, well behind his desperate eyes
The epistemology of loss, how to stand up
Knowing what every man must one day know
And must know many days, how to stand up.
And gradually light returns to the street,
A whistle blows, the ball is out of sight,
Soon part of me will explore the deep and dark
Floor of the harbour... I am everywhere,
I suffer and move, my mind and my heart move
With all that move me, under the water
Or whistling. I am not a little boy.

|

04 October, 2005

FIRST-PERSON NARRATIVE

First-person narratives are a lot of fun. Here's one I made earlier:

The two kids were pleading with us. They were desperate by then so I don’t think there were tears even though they were making this crying noise. They were saying “Please don’t kill us. Please don’t kill us. Please don’t. Don’t kill us. Please don’t kill us”. They were saying it over and over and over again. I could tell they were terrified – on their faces and in their whiny, whinging voices. It was completely doing my head in. I didn’t know what to do, to be honest. I looked at you but you were holding it together and you just gave me a nod. It was a nod, like, “Go ahead and do it”. I couldn’t bring myself to, though. It was a total nightmare. I didn’t want to. They were sounding like they were crying and they wouldn’t stop. I wasn’t feeling as sorry for them after a while because I just wanted them to shut up. I couldn't get my head together. “The more you talk to them, the harder it’s going to be”, you said, “So cut out the chat and get the fuck on with it”. I heard you say “going to be”, like it was inevitable. It stood out, that “going to be”. It was like, hearing that made me realise I was going to have to do it. Something changed then and I reckon that’s when I caved in. You wore me down cos you made it sound certain.

Don’t get me wrong, I only wanted it to end and they weren’t going to end it and neither were you so it was all down to me, as usual. I didn’t want to prolong it anymore so it seemed like the best thing for all of us. We’d been there for so many hours. Of course, I DIDN’T WANT TO DO IT.

I thought about running out and escaping all three of them but it would never have worked. He wanted them dead, not me. I mean to say, I didn't want them dead and he didn't want me dead. He wanted them dead, but he didn’t want to be the one that did it. Bastard. I was as trapped as they were. I suppose I must have been insane but if I was, it was him that drove me insane. They wouldn’t shut up and he wouldn’t make it all right. He held us all there and we couldn’t get out and they were doing all that begging and pleading.

I shut my eyes and tried not to listen to any of them. After I’d hit them as hard as I could... I think it was lumps of concrete or something in one of them canvas sacks... they went quiet. I felt sick because the rocks connected with their heads and they were both hard, you know, when they made contact. It was hard work. But when I hit them the first time and they went floppy it was easier to carry on. I didn’t want to think about what I was doing so I just kept swinging the rocks at their heads as fast as I could to get it over with. I suppose they were dead because they were quiet and they weren’t moving. I don't remember any screaming. I didn’t look at them, either - I suppose I must have blanked it all out. I hated every second of it and I suppose I must have been out of control but I was so glad they weren’t hysterical any more and I wanted him off my back. It was calmer after the first time I hit them and then when I’d finished I was relieved it was all over.

|

TITANIA EXPRESSES A PREFERENCE

Here’s a conundrum as old as time: romantic inclination – a mystery that can’t be solved by objective scrutiny. In fact, in so many cases, objectively scrutinising the inclination only deepens the mystery.

Shakespeare has a character assume the appearance of a donkey in a Midsummer Night's Dream. (Nick Bottom, the weaver). This exchange between them is a good one:

Titania: Mine ear is much enamoured of they note;
So is mine eye enthralled to thy shape;
And thy fair virtue’s force perforce doth move me,
On the first view, to say, to swear, I love thee.
Bottom: Methinks, mistress, you should have little reason for that.

B is completely bemused - it's the most bizarre part of the play. I hope it won't be hell teaching ‘boring, crap Shakespeare’ to teenagers who fail to see how the ideas could possibly relate to them, not realising that they often do.

|

03 October, 2005

CYCLE PAVEMENTS

This is from an anonymous Guardian journalist and here's the link to post a message of support: www.guardian.co.uk/sparkthedebate

Why not take cyclists off the roads completely? Put them on the pavements...
Near-death experiences are supposed to provoke profound reflection. Speaking for myself, the exact opposite seems to be the case. Cycling home the other day, having narrowly avoided being sandwiched between a bendy bus and a white van, the most banal, obvious thought popped into my head: motorised transport and bicycles don't mix.

The conundrum is this. We need to get on bikes more, but bikes are too puny to share the road with the likes of bendy-bus driver and white-van man. Although allocated cycle routes have worked for bike-friendly countries like Denmark and Holland, our cycle paths, cobbled together on the cheap by civic engineers with little understanding of the needs of regular cyclists, aren't up to the job. With the health of the environment and the *lives* of 140 cyclists a year at stake, surely it's time to admit defeat and impose automotive apartheid. The best, most economical way to do this? Simply reserve half our pavements for bikes. Pedestrians use one side, cyclists the other and we leave the roads to the internal combustion engine.

Of course, the backlash would be fairly predictable: there would always be some who would argue that, if we take over pavements, pedestrians will hate cyclists even more than they do already. But the time has come to face a few harsh truths: bikes have more or less colonised pavements anyway - something has to give, and the sooner pedestrians accept that certain sacrifices have to be made, the better it will be for all of us.

Desperate times call for desperate measures. And as I can attest after my recent brush with mortality, it's a war zone out there.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

I feel that problems arise from the belief held by pedestrians (and by society at large) that pavements are for pedestrians and roads are for traffic. Just because this is the way it's always been doesn't make it an unalterable fact, nor does it equate to "the best way". Pedestrians have had pavements to themselves for long enough. If I had a pound for everytime someone told me "I'd love my kids to cycle to school but it's too dangerous" I'd be fabulously wealthy. If cycling were perceived as safe, the roads would be much quieter, especially in built-up provincial areas. I wouldn't recommend that cyclists steam in and take over every high street. On main trunk roads the pavements are often very wide and certainly wide enough for a cycle lane. Also, on pavements lining these arterial routes (not motorways), there are seldom many pedestrians anyway because everyone, so it seems, is in a car. Cyclists would have to give way and slow down for pedestrians, naturally. Of course there are those who would disobey this etiquette but in all probability they are likely the ones who disobey it already. Finally, if a cyclist accidentally brushes against a pedestrian in passing, it's hardly a disaster is it?? The worst-case scenario probably equates to a split carrier bag, which, in the grand scheme of things, is a minor inconvenience worthy of an "Oi!". (Remember: the majority of people drive to and from supermarkets....) Hardly the same inconvenience as a double decker bus, transit van or heavy plant vehicle knocking you to the ground and running over your feet or body.

With all the new houses being built on greenbelt land in inaccessible areas miles out of town, many more people will soon be forced to drive on already-gridlocked roads whether they want to or not. So, all in all, I'm fairly relaxed about the issue of cyclists on the pavements. Only a matter of time...

|

01 October, 2005


1/10

Seneca: No good thing renders its possessor happy, unless his mind is reconciled to the possibility of its loss.

Death is the easiest loss of all to bear: nothing is lost with less discomfort that that which, when lost, cannot be missed.

Schopenhauer: What disturbs and depresses young people is the hunt for happiness on the firm assumption that it will be met with in life. From this arises constantly deluded hope and so also dissatisfaction. Deceptive images of a vague happiness hover before us in our dreams ... and so we search in vain. Much would be gained if through timely advice and instruction, young people could eradicate from their minds the erroneous notion that the world has a great deal to offer them

Philosophers are always directly and of their own accord preparing themselves for dying and death... forever struggling to attain the wisdom only death affords. In life, we are constantly subject to the deceptions of sense and the delusions of desire.

| |