Grist to the Mill

28 September, 2005

CONKERS

I love conkers. If you're out walking and happen upon a particularly large, spiky green case, it can be pretty difficult not to pick it up and prise the conker out. They're not always as big as the case would suggest! Still, they are lovely to hold in the palm of one's hand (smooth, glossy, cool). I feel a bit sad if I see lots of ungathered conkers in the road being ground to a pulp by passing cars.

In Adrian Mole's diary he considered himself a man and no longer a boy when he went walking with Pandora and refrained from throwing sticks at trees. If I were walking with a man in Autumn, I think I'd like him to throw sticks at trees.

|

23 September, 2005

"HELL IS OTHER PEOPLE"

Well - isn't it?

|

22 September, 2005

JONATHAN WOODGATE

Poor Jonathan Woodgate! What a disaster: yellow card, own goal, sent off. Could only have happened to an ex-Leeds player.

|

KNIVES

Student canteen. If I were on the TV show 'Room 101' I'd gladly send everyone who pushes food around their plate while holding a knife like a pen. Maybe that's how they learnt to eat but I suspect it's an attempt to look sophisticated. One day, I'd love to grab the knife and use it to deliver a firm rap across the back of the hand, in the hope that the pain of this would equal the pain of sitting opposite people who eat this way.

|

21 September, 2005

ANOTHER THING

I finally dispensed with my iMac. It looked great but Apple are hopeless, really. When it developed a fault the AppleStore didn't fix it properly which I never forgot about. If you have someone on hand who knows all about AppleMacs, then fine, that's great. If not, you dig yourself into a very big hole the moment you leave the shop with it. Best to stick with Windows and PCs. Mac computers seem to be a bit of an esoteric black art, regarded as alternative and a bit mysterious by so many people. Why buy into a technology that noone knows anything about? Where's the sense in that?

|

20 September, 2005

IN PRAISE OF ELO

Marks & Spencers are plugging their Autumn-Winter collection at the moment and the advert seems to appear at every commercial break. They used ELO's Mr Blue Sky as the backing track. After seeing the ad for the hundredth time I decided to order a 'Best of' CD from Amazon.

As with all bands from the 60s and 70s, ELO have more than one 'Best of' or 'Greatest Hits'. This one though ("All Over the World"), seems to have been expensively remastered because it sounds - whoa! bloody excellent!!! if truth be told. I'm not sure it was particularly "with it" to like ELO even back then; Alan Partridge once said on 'Knowing Me Knowing You' that ELO were his favourite band(!). While most tracks truly are "as middle of the road as a dead hedgehog" (Roland Alphonso) a few stand out. Especially 'The Diary of Horace Wimp'. It sounds almost like a naff novelty song if you don't listen to it properly. That's what I used to think when I was a kid and my parents played it. If, on the other hand, it's played with the volume cranked up through a good stereo or, in my case, through a discman with good headphones (Vivanco, darling) it doesn't sound like anything else at all. It's well-produced studio pop at it's finest - full of overdubbing, echo and abundant strings. It's tremendous. I love it. Jeff Lynne, in the sleeve notes, confesses: "Some of these songs are so over the top it's amazing. For a while there I went through a phase where I definitely thought that 'more is more' and overdubbed everything that wasn't nailed down... Most of these songs were recorded in Munich, home of the largest beers in the world. Richard Tandy would always say to me 'Is this stuff legal?' I knew what he meant".

I know what he meant too. ELO! not so much a band, either, but the songwriting and production of one man. Jeff Lynne: I salute you.

I'm sure M&S's campaign have boosted his royalties no end (deservedly so).

|

13 September, 2005

QUAIL

Also read this today, in the Collins Gem book of Birds. It made me laugh. I don't know why, it's not that funny:

Adult: Small (18cm), vocal but secretive and well-camoulaged game bird, smaller than a thrush. Underparts sandy buff, upperparts mottled browns, fawns and chestnuts, white streaked. Watch for broader buff stripes on crown and small black bib o male, otherwise sexes similar. Flies only as a last resort.

|

THE IRRITATION OF READING THE GUARDIAN

Sometimes, sactimonious Guardian readers put me off reading it. Consider this, sent to an "Eco Confessions" column - subtitled "It's Not Easy Being Green" (might as well be 'It's not easy being perfect'; 'It's not easy being a Guardian reader') where people write in with guilty little secrets, like members of a clique.

P. Stephens of Hackney (where else?) "isn't keen" on curtailing her globe-trotting.

"I'm not keen on giving up foreign holidays to save the environment. The world would be a poorer place without a better understanding of other peoples. Only in India have I seen flip-flops being mended rather than thrown away."

So, one P. Stephens - keen not to make the world 'a poorer place' - is presumably 'enriched' for being a poverty tourist watching people mend their shoes. No doubt she also has some nice photos. I'd be interested to know how she uses this understanding - perhaps with an Oxfam subscription although somehow, I suspect not.

|

11 September, 2005

A TALE OF THE UNEXPECTED

During the summer I taught for five weeks at a summer school. There’s nothing remarkable about this, except that the summer school uses the exquisite buildings and top-notch facilities of a prestigious public school. For three of the five weeks my classroom was on the first floor of the oldest building of all – construction began in 1572.

One night, when a friend was clearing up and arranging desks (same building but before I got there), she heard something from upstairs. She described it as the sound of something dragging on the floor. The other teachers were long gone and had left the front-door key so she could lock up on her way out. Confident that she was the only person in the building, the noise made her feel uncomfortable and she left quickly.

H. told the Director of Studies about this, who casually mentioned a teacher from a previous year reporting something similar. That was when I began to get interested. I asked a friendly (but doubtful) security guard whether he’d heard stories about this building and he told me “There’s a rumour”. I also asked a chap in his 70s who runs the [Boarding School] Museum, and he told me that “a fey Irishman” who taught in the building a decade ago constantly reported sightings of a ghost. “Right!”, I thought, “That’s four different and independent suggestions of something unusual”. Bearing in mind that these ‘stories’ amounted only to rumour and suggestion, I decided to go there at night.

I’m open-minded but sceptical on the matter of ghosts, having never had an experience of a ghost or even of anything ghostly (this, in spite of trying in vain to seek out ghosts in my teens). If pushed one way or the other, I’m inclined to disbelieve in spirits or ‘presences’. Yet – do humans have a ‘soul’ or not? Who can definitively answer this question? Science can weigh, measure, observe, examine, etc, but it is ultimately limited by the tools and equipment we have (thus far) devised for its observation/examination, etc. We are not godlike or omniscient and cannot know everything. What, exactly, happens to consciousness after death? I’m strongly inclined to think that it dies along with – and within – our flesh. However, given the impossible task of empirically proving or disproving the “reality” of the metaphysical (‘above or beyond physics &/or the physical’), I think only the most dogmatic thinker would vigorously and flatly deny the mere possibility of ghosts.

Here, then, is what happened. I went to this building at about 2.15am with three others (two women and a man). We went up several flights of oak-panelled stairs to the top of the building. I’d had a couple of beers during the evening but was not what you would describe as “drunk”. The three of us sat around two desks pushed together. Someone suggested we join hands to “link” our “energy”. In spite of thinking this a corny idea, I went along with it. One of the women began to speak aloud saying things such as “If anything is there, we wish it peace of mind”; “If anyone is there, it can make itself known to us”, etc. Of course, nothing happened. We were silent much more than we spoke. I became aware that we were using the third person and suggested she use “you” rather than the more distant “it”. She carried on in the same manner as before but in the second person, with the other three of us occasionally chiming in “Please reveal yourself to us; we don’t wish you any harm”. etc, etc.

We continued like this for about ten minutes. It seems foolish re-telling it and initially felt foolish at the time. We were high up in a building that perches on top of a hill. There were no main roads nearby and it was the early hours of the morning, so there would have been few or no flights into or out of the nearby private airport and few people on the streets. However, I thought I could hear a very feint growl emanating from my right-hand side near the window. I told myself again and again during the joining-of-hands that old buildings – especially those lined with wood – are subject to all kinds of ambient noise and that they creak occasionally, especially where beams, window sills, other "structural things" join together with the fabric of the building. This growl was intermittent, very much off-and-on – it wasn’t a particularly sinister growl but it didn’t really sound like the environmental noise of an old building, either. It was so feint I didn’t bother mentioning it to the others: a) because I wasn’t sure whether I had actually heard the sound of something external or whether I had imagined it, and b) because I didn’t want to talk over it (and thereby drown it out) if and when it recurred. The noise was so quiet it would’ve been obscured by a low speaking voice.

After ten minutes we gave it up and concluded we’d seen nor heard anything untoward. The DoS and the man headed back to the lodgings, leaving just me and a girlfriend. We chatted about various things, including our experience (or lack of) in the building, and agreed that we’d heard the odd creak but nothing “ghostly”. I didn’t bother mentioning the growl – to my sceptical mind it had been inconclusive, just something-and-nothing. After a few minutes of just the two of us, we decided to head back too as it was very late. I said to H. that I’d like to have a couple of minutes sitting there alone and that I’d see her outside by the door on the eroded concrete step. She understood and set off. The growl didn’t recur. I’d secretly wanted to come to the building alone, at night, but had been too cowardly. I knew that I wouldn’t have the nerve to come back alone, so wasn’t going to let this opportunity to be on my own slip through my fingers. I took my time getting up and leaving the room but nothing happened at all.

I descended the stairs slowly, glad that I was alone on the stairwell. I had done something of a mental “wrap” as I left the room (audited our experience and concluded that our time had been uneventful). As I walked slowly down the stairs I began to think of the stampede of boys’ feet and boots on the bowed wooden stairs during the daytime, in daylight, over centuries. Then I heard the growl again - very loud and directly into my right ear as if originating from two inches away, over my shoulder. It was unmistakably the same noise I thought I’d heard before but this time it left me in no doubt. Here was that same noise only much, much louder and seeming to come from an unsettlingly close range.

I have found no explanation for this. The first time I heard the noise (in the room), it was very quiet. It certainly wouldn’t have been audible from halfway down the stairs. I have used the word ‘growl’ because this is the most suitable word in the language to describe it, but a growl must have a source, even if it is only the building itself? If the windowpanes or window frame made the growl (which seems unlikely), how could the growl then recur on an enclosed staircase (where there are no windows)? I know that the sceptical would say that the occasion itself caused me to hallucinate or imagine, but my senses are very reliable and I am not a particularly fanciful person (in spite of going looking for ghosts!!! It takes a lot for me to overcome my natural scepticism). I’ve never had an auditory hallucination before.

It felt as if the hostile growl had followed me down the staircase to surprise and target me from behind, directly into my ear.

The shock must have showed on my face because when I arrived at the front door, the first thing H. said was "Are you all right?"

(On ghosts:) “I used to be indecisive but now I’m not so sure.”

|

08 September, 2005

DOCTOR, DOCTOR

Today's Guardian has a short feature about scientists and their favourite jokes. Who knows what the point of this is - presumably to show that scientists, serious as they are perceived, are in possession of a SoH. Or that even the cleverest people are partial to a crap joke. Here are some:

Martin Rees, Astronomer Royals and professor of cosmology and astrophysics at the University of Cambridge said "One cartoon I like has a salutary message for 'pure' scientists who get above themselves and don't appreciate technology":
A rabbit and a beaver are looking up at the Boulder Dam. The beaver is saying "I didn't actually build it, but it's based on my idea".

Which kind of disproves my first idea about the point of running the article.

Marcus du Sautoy, professor of maths at Oxford University and author of Music of the Primes:
Q: How can you spot an extrovert mathematician?
A: He looks at your shoes when he talks to you.

(My fave of all the jokes, although this next one is good too.)

Raj Persaud, consultant psychiatrist and senior lecturer at the Maudsley Hospitals and Institute of Psychiatry, and presenter of All in the Mind, on Radio 4:
Q: How many psychoanalysts does it take to change a lightbulb?
A: Two, one to change the lightbulb and another to hold the penis. Sorry! - ladder.

Can't be bothered to type many more out, but this last one is piss-poor. The kind of thing printed on ice-lolly sticks.

Susan Greenfield, professor of pharmacology at Oxford University, director of the Royal Institution of Great Britain and member of the House of Lords.
Q: What is an ig?
A: An Eskimo's home without a loo.

Did I miss something here?

|

DAYTIME TV

Was pottering about with the TV on - I think the show was Judge Judy (or similar). The name doesn't matter - it was a pointless daytime show which aimed to rake over the precipiating factors that later led to a traffic incident.

A woman's voice, in a decidedly wheedling and defensive tone, wafted out from the television studio with the following line.

"But for the most part, I was in control of the vehicle".

(Damn! Always the pesky lesser part of things that causes the trouble.)

|

06 September, 2005

THE FORTUNE TELLER

I put a dollar into a machine in Las Vegas a couple of weeks ago. A pirate with a patch over his eye dispensed a card with my fortune on it. It was a dollar well spent because it gave me a laugh. The fortune started out with great promise but by the end its message was considerably darker. I'm not at all sure it was the rosy prognosis I had hoped for. Here it is:

I see a great deal of happiness in store for you [so far, so good]. Thousands of candles can be lighted from a single candle, and the life of the candle will not be shortened. Happiness never decreases by being shared. So, if an object you ardently pursue brings little happiness when gained, remember most of our pleasures come from unexpected sources. [A bit of a mixed blessing, there then]. Share the good news when it arrives.
For happiness is like a sunbeam which the least shadow shall intercept, while suffering is as often as the rain of spring. Enjoy this day.

Hmmmm...

|

CHILD'S PLAY

I recently spent an hour playing with a four-year-old. He had an amazing amount of toys and he really was an animated, garrulous little soul - completely free of that shyness that kids sometimes have, which compells them to hide behind their mother's legs, etc.

He decided that we should play Kings and Princesses, and produced a crown which he put on his head, a sword and a bag of gold coins. We played in these roles for a while but he kept getting distracted by all his other toys (there were a lot). I decided to try to get him back on to Kings and Princesses. I thought it would be fun, and that he might enjoy, being a tyrannical King - punishing all the other toys. I suggested that Buzz Lightyear had stolen a toy car and that we should send him to prison. Or that Bob the Builder had taken some of the large gold coins and stashed them under his hard hat. For this, there could be no lesser punishment than to chop off his head.

What happened next amused me greatly: he gave me a funny look and shouted (he was LOUD, this kid), "But Bob the Builder's NOT REAL!". (It was a foam head and shoulders of Bob the Builder). I said that I knew this but it might be fun to pretend. He wouldn't have any of it. He insisted that Bob was only a toy, in a way that made me feel utterly stupid for entering into the spirit of his imaginative play.

Obviously, I didn't point out that all of the last half hour's games had been pretend and not "real". It's funny how kids - espeically when they are clever and confident, are perfectly happy to act out the most fantastical, far-fetched scenarios as long as they are directing it and "in charge". When an adult tries to suggest some pretend stuff, they suddenly act like little adults - the subtext seems to be (raising eyes to heaven) "Don't be so silly". I notice this time and again with kids. It's comical.

| |